Comparing centralized vs distributed protocols for wireless sensor networks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46589/rdiasf.vi33.395

Keywords:

IoT, AODV, WSN, QUATTRO, Energy

Abstract

Academy, industry, and society are finding many areas of application of the Internet of Things, creating new services. However, the analysis of energy consumption carried out by the components of the network, in specific during the establishment of the routing, is a hot topic because many studies are carried out by simulations. The proposed API permits evaluate routing protocols and applications by means of a friendly interface developed using C# introducing development improvement to a wide set of IoT applications. Moreover, a wireless sensor was created using XBee Series 1 and IEEE 802.15.4 standard to evaluate protocols and applications through a real scenario. The energy consumption analysis carried out with the API and wireless sensor is very similar with the results obtained by simulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anastasi, G., Conti, M., Francesco, M., Passarella, A., Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: a survey, Ad Hoc Networks 7(3), pp. 537-568 (2009).

Chen, S., Xu, H., Liu, D., Hu, B., Wang, H., A vision of IoT: Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities with China Perspective. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(4), 349-359 (2014).

Dengler, S., Awad, A.,Dressler, F., Sensor/Actuator Networks in Smart homes for Supporting Elderly and handicapped People, Interantional Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, pp. 863-868, 2007.

Fall, K., Varadhan, K., ns Notes and Documents, The VINT Project. UC Berkeley, LBL, USC/ISI, and Xerox PARC, 2000.

Ferronato, J.J. y Trentin, M.A.S., Analysis of Routing Protocols OLSR, AODV and ZRP in Real Urban Vehicular Scenario with Density Variation. IEEE Latin America Transactions 15(9), pp. 1727-1734 (2017).

From the Death Criterion Perspective. International Journal of Handheld Computing Research, DOI: 10.4018/IJHCR.2017070103. (2017).

Fotino, M., Gozzi, A., Cano, J.C., Calafate, C., De Rango, F., Manzoni, P., Marano, S., Evaluating energy consumption of proactive and reactive routing protocols in a MANET. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.,Vol. 248, Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks, pp. 119-130 (2007).

Hung, M., Leading the IoT – Gartner Insights on How to Lead in a Connected World. Gartner, 2017.

Giannoulis, S., Antonopoulos, C., Topalis, E., Koubias, S., ZRP versus DSR and TORA: A comprehensive survey on ZRP performance, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 3(1), 63-72 (2007).

Jiang, M., Li, J., Tay, Y.C., Cluster Based Routing Protocol (CBRP), draft-ietfmant- cbrp-spec-01.txt, 1999.

Johnson, D., Maltz, D.A. Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. Mobile Computing, pp.153-181 (1996).

Kanakaris, V., Ndzi, D., Azzi, D., Ad-hoc Networks energy consumption: A review of the ad-hoc routing protocols. Journal of Engineering and Technology Review 3(1) pp. 162-167 (2010).

Nadilma, C.V.N Pereira y Renato M. de Moraes, Comparative analysis of AODV route recovery mechanisms in wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Latina America Transactions 8(4), pp. 385-393 (2010).

Paul R. Santiago N. Stalin R. Vanessa A. Luis B. Christian R. Internet de las cosas y redes de sensors inalámbricos: Review. Sistemas embebidos: Estado actual con visión al futuro. (2017).

Pascual Espada, J., Diseño de objetos virtuales colaborativos orientados a servicios en el marco de Internet de las cosas. Universidad de Oviedo, 1-279 (2012).

Perking, C., Royer, E., Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, Internet Draft, MANET working group, draft.ietf-manet-aodv-05.txt, 2000.

Ruiz, J. Garlladro, J.R., Villasenor-Gonzlaez, L., Makrakis, D., Mouftah, H.T., QUATTRO: QoS capabale cross-Layer MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks, Global Telecommunications Conference, GLOBECOM, PP. 1-6, (2009).

Vermesan, O. Friess, P., Internet of Things – from research and innovation to market deployment. River Publishers, Dinamarca, 2014.

Sara N. Nada E. Ahmed K. Samy S. Ramez M. Hassanein H. WSN Lifetime and Reliability Analysis

Srivastava, A., Mishra, A., Upadhyay, S., A conceptual overview of energy consumption based routing protocol – ECBR. International Journal of Computer Applications 92(3), 18-22 (2014).

Sultan, T. M., Zaki, S. M., Evaluation of energy consumption of reactive and proactive routing protocols in MANET. International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications 9(2), pp. 29-38 (2017).

W. Hu, H.H. Li, W.H. Yao, Y.W. Hu, Energy Optimization for WSN in Ubiquitous Power Internet of Things. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, Shangai, China (2019).

Zhang, Y., Hsiao-Wa, C., Mohsen, G., Cooperative Wireless Communciations, 2009.

Zorzi, M., Gluhak, A.A., Lange, S., Bassi, A., From today’s INTRAnet of Things to a Future INTERnet of Things: A Wireless- and Mobility- Related View. IEEE Wireless Communications, 17(6), 44-51 (2010).

Published

2020-12-29

How to Cite

Ruiz Ibarra, J., Espinoza Zallas, E., Andrade Salinas, P., Aguilar Limon, J., & Ruiz Ibarra, E. . (2020). Comparing centralized vs distributed protocols for wireless sensor networks. Revista De Investigación Académica Sin Frontera: Facultad Interdisciplinaria De Ciencias Económicas Administrativas - Departamento De Ciencias Económico Administrativas-Campus Navojoa, (33), 22. https://doi.org/10.46589/rdiasf.vi33.395

Issue

Section

Artículos

Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.